For Christmas I received an interesting gift from a pal - my very own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a couple of basic prompts about me provided by my friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of .

It simulates my chatty style of composing, but it's likewise a bit repetitive, and extremely verbose. It might have exceeded Janet's triggers in looking at data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repeated hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had offered around 150,000 customised books, generally in the US, given that rotating from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who created it, can purchase any further copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone developing one in anyone's name, including stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, developed by AI, and developed "solely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is intended as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get offered further.

He wants to expand his variety, producing various genres such as sci-fi, and perhaps providing an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted type of customer AI - selling AI-generated products to human consumers.

It's likewise a bit terrifying if, addsub.wiki like me, you compose for a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to produce, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable content based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are discussing information here, we in fact indicate human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is images. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think the use of generative AI for creative purposes need to be banned, but I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without authorization must be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very effective however let's build it fairly and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually selected to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have actually chosen to collaborate - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to utilize creators' content on the internet to assist establish their models, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He mentions that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is also highly versus getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and an entire lot of joy," says the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening among its best performing industries on the vague guarantee of development."

A federal government spokesperson stated: "No relocation will be made till we are absolutely confident we have a useful strategy that provides each of our goals: increased control for right holders to help them license their material, access to top quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI plan, a nationwide information library containing public information from a large range of sources will also be made readily available to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to improve the safety of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector needed to share information of the operations of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is said to desire the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a number of suits versus AI companies, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the web without their permission, and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of factors which can constitute fair use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training information and whether it ought to be paying for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It became one of the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its technology for a fraction of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I truly desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weakness in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It has plenty of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.

But offered how quickly the tech is progressing, I'm unsure the length of time I can stay positive that my considerably slower human writing and editing abilities, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest advancements in global innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters around the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.