For Christmas I got an intriguing gift from a pal - my really own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a few basic prompts about me provided by my friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and really amusing in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty style of writing, but it's also a bit repeated, and really verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's prompts in looking at information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually sold around 150,000 customised books, primarily in the US, since rotating from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who developed it, can buy any further copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody developing one in any person's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, produced by AI, and created "exclusively to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is meant as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get sold even more.

He intends to expand his range, generating different genres such as sci-fi, and maybe offering an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - selling AI-generated goods to human customers.

It's likewise a bit frightening if, wikibase.imfd.cl like me, you write for forum.altaycoins.com a living. Not least because it probably took less than a minute to create, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable material based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are talking about data here, we really mean human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is images. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think making use of generative AI for innovative functions should be prohibited, however I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without permission ought to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very effective however let's build it ethically and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually chosen to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have actually chosen to team up - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to use developers' content on the web to help establish their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He explains that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and messing up the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is likewise highly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a whole lot of happiness," states the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining among its best performing industries on the unclear guarantee of development."

A government representative stated: "No move will be made up until we are absolutely positive we have a practical plan that provides each of our objectives: increased control for right holders to assist them certify their material, access to high-quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's new AI plan, a national data library consisting of public information from a wide variety of sources will likewise be made offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to improve the security of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector classihub.in needed to share information of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is stated to desire the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a variety of claims versus AI companies, bphomesteading.com and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been secured by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their authorization, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of factors which can make up reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it gathers training data and whether it must be paying for it.

If this wasn't all enough to consider, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its technology for a portion of the rate of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It has lots of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be rather difficult to read in parts because it's so long-winded.

But provided how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm unsure the length of time I can remain positive that my substantially slower human writing and editing abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest advancements in global technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.

Outside the UK? Register here.